Implications of the Hallé case for the philanthropic exemption

A recent First Tier decision, Hallé Concert Society, TC05067, has an apparently major impact on the potential scope of the exemption for membership subscriptions to charities.

Hallé is an orchestra and a charity.  It has a membership scheme that gives members democratic involvement in the charity.  It argued that it ought to have exempted these membership subscriptions because it is a philanthropic body.  On this argument it was successful.  It also argued that the benefits to members did not constitute a supply to them within the scope of VAT.  On that argument it was unsuccessful.

The benefits offered are all referable to the charity’s purposes and objects.  They include such benefits as priority booking, events focused on the work of the orchestra, and provision of information.  The subscriptions are modest, in line with these modest benefits.  There are no events involving catering or discounts for products sold etc.. Whilst the lack of these was not mentioned in the decision, they are clearly relevant considerations since the exemption can only apply if the benefits are referable to the purposes of the body.

The key issue, therefore, was whether orchestral music is a philanthropic activity.  The tribunal held that it is.  In doing so, the tribunal commented that ‘philanthropy’ is a wide concept, rather than a narrow one.  It subsumes all that is charitable, but goes wider than charitable activity.  The fact that it is defined as helping the welfare of fellow human beings does not restrict is meaning to direct help for unfortunate people (though we knew that from Game Conservancy Trust), and in effect means that any activity provided on a subsidised basis which can have a good impact on humans is philanthropic.  In this case, providing music is philanthropic where it can be shown to be provided at a financial loss.  The Hallé has always made a loss (in common with all subsidised orchestras and other culture providers).  Hence the body is philanthropic.

On this basis, it is difficult to see how any subscription to a members’ scheme where the member has some form of democratic involvement (since I think this case only applies specifically in such a situation) and the benefits are referable to those aims, would fail to be exempt.  This would be beneficial in many cases, though not in all, since it creates a partial exemption cost.  Up to this point, a general view prevailed that ‘philanthropic’ had to denote a narrower category than ‘charitable’.  It had to link specifically to the welfare of humans, rather than to less tangible ‘good’ to the world such as the arts and education.  However, the tribunal believed that the history of philanthropy put it in a different light to this and gave a much wider meaning.

While I believe HMRC is certain to appeal it, and I think the decision could well be overturned, this could be a case that takes the definition of ‘philanthropic’ into the various appeal courts – it needs to be treated with caution.

Comments

  1. Unelymn says:

    Due to residual amounts of feeds that remain in the production lines circuit, a certain degree of cross contamination of subsequently produced feed batches seems technically unavoidable and raises the question to what extent these residual amounts pose a risk for animal and human health precio priligy 30 mg

  2. wool product says:

    Hello there! Do you know if they make any plugins to help with Search Engine Optimization? I’m trying to get my website
    to rank for some targeted keywords but I’m not seeing very good success.
    If you know of any please share. Many thanks! You can read similar art here:
    Eco product

  3. baby spice hairstyles says:

    Landmark offered the News & Record newspaper in Greensboro, North Carolina to Berkshire Hathaway on January 31, 2013.

  4. sugar defender reviews says:

    sugar defender reviews
    As somebody who’s constantly been cautious about my blood sugar level, finding Sugar Protector
    has actually been a relief. I really feel so much a lot more in control, and my current examinations have shown positive enhancements.

    Understanding I have a dependable supplement to sustain my regular provides
    me comfort. I’m so happy for Sugar Protector’s impact
    on my wellness!

  5. Vavada Casino says:

    Good post. I learn something new and challenging on sites I stumbleupon on a daily basis. It will always be interesting to read through articles from other authors and practice something from other web sites.

  6. pandora jewelry says:

    I love reading a post that will make people think. Also, thanks for allowing me to comment.

  7. 파라존 코리아 카지노 says:

    Great post! We will be linking to this great content on our website. Keep up the great writing.

  8. 라카지노 says:

    I blog frequently and I truly thank you for your content. The article has really peaked my interest. I’m going to take a note of your site and keep checking for new details about once a week. I subscribed to your Feed as well.

  9. trending videos online says:

    An impressive share! I have just forwarded this onto a co-worker who had been conducting a little research on this. And he actually bought me lunch because I discovered it for him… lol. So allow me to reword this…. Thank YOU for the meal!! But yeah, thanks for spending some time to talk about this issue here on your website.

  10. Meet Our CEO, Rachel Serwetz says:

    Good post. I learn something new and challenging on blogs I stumbleupon every day. It will always be exciting to read articles from other writers and use a little something from other web sites.

  11. snaptik says:

    Hi, I do think your website may be having browser compatibility issues. When I take a look at your site in Safari, it looks fine however when opening in IE, it’s got some overlapping issues. I merely wanted to give you a quick heads up! Besides that, excellent site.

  12. mi tower says:

    Just now you can branch out from your daily understanding. The best thing you can do is become relevant with yourself and faithful with your own morals. Generally this will lead to a mistaken and unproductive life.

Join the discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *