CJEU decision on the University of Cambridge case on VAT and investment management fees
The Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) has given what may prove to be the last binding decision on the UK regarding a case the UK courts have referred to it for decision (C-316/18 – The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Cambridge). It turns out to be one of the most unwelcome of all its decisions, and the negative impact on charities could become considerable.
The narrow focus of this decision is the treatment of VAT on investment management services. The question is whether a charity, given that it is deemed to carry out investment activity essentially on a ‘private’ basis, can view these costs as part of the overheads of all its business activities rather than a direct cost of the investment activity alone. If it can, then the rate of overhead recovery applies, whereas, if not, no recovery is possible. This, therefore, has a significant direct impact on charities that have taxable activities (whether or not as part of a wider range of non-business and other exempt activities) and which have large investment portfolios (though, as explained below, a wider impact may also apply).
As in all ‘partial exemption’ cases, the analysis is very abstract in nature, but to reduce it to basic concepts, the Court decided that these costs were not an overhead of the charitable activities, but were solely referable to the investment activity, and that this did not (at least in this case) involve the making of any taxable supplies. So, it followed that no recovery was available.
We can expect HMRC to assess charities that have been making proportionate claims on such fees, and to enforce assessments that have already been issued. Charities may need to consider contingent liabilities with their auditors. Where charities have made claims based on the Cambridge University principle, they probably need to issue an error correction disclosure to HMRC. However, we would hope that HMRC will issue a Brief to inform charities (and other non-profits) as to what is expected of them.
UPDATE: HMRC officials had previously indicated to CTG that they were waiting on a Court of Appeal judgment before commenting on the implications of the case, so we await HMRC’s next steps. Until then charities that can say that their funds are partly or wholly created from earned income, rather than donated income, may be able to conclude that decision cannot be assumed to apply to them until HMRC issues its view on the litigation. Charities would be advised to discuss this with their professional advisors before taking any further action.
That is the narrow impact, but considerable concern is raised also about a wider impact.
This relates to the costs of general fundraising (such as seeking donations, grants, and bequests). Ever since the UK courts’ decision in Church of England Children’s Society it has been assumed that VAT on such costs is an overhead of the general activities of the charity (subject to the caveat that the funds raised must be used to support the making of the taxable supplies of the charity). This was based on the argument that a Court of Justice decision, Kretztechnick, established that the raising of funds was an overhead of the business for which the funds were raised. However, the University of Cambridge decision deals unhelpfully with the Kretztechnick precedent, when seeking to explain why it did not assist the University’s case. In that case, the costs were in relation to a rights issue, which was deemed not to be a supply at all (but mere raising of capital). The Court explained that the reason to allow these costs to be viewed as an overhead was that the costs would be reflected in the price of the goods and services sold by the company that had sought equity funding. This was to be contrasted, the Court said, with the case of a charity, since a charity used the funds to subsidise the supplies it made, and not to add to the cost base of the supply by being incorporated into that price.
This is, to say the least, a puzzling economic argument. However, the Court of Justice is the de facto supreme court, so there is no opportunity to question the decision made. It implies, fairly strongly, that the case for viewing costs of raising funding from donations to support charitable supplies is greatly weakened. As to whether HMRC will take the extra step of seeking to roll back the Children’s Society precedent is another matter, and we will have to await further policy comment from HMRC to understand whether this is a point that they will take in practice. On this wider issue, therefore, charities will probably want to maintain a watching brief.
The decision appears also to have potential ramifications for the case concerning reverse charges applying to imported services. The apparent corollary of this decision is that charities do not act in the role of ‘taxable persons’ when importing investment management services, even where they are VAT registered. Accordingly, they potentially need not apply the reverse charge. This point is currently being litigated by the Wellcome Trust which won the point in the First tier Tribunal. Although that decision is under appeal, HMRC may find that it cannot win the appeal following the University of Cambridge decision, and it may even withdraw. That, one might say, is a potential silver lining to this decision. The wider question then also arises, which is the possibility of no reverse charge on general fundraising costs (applying the same analysis as above). If so, then VAT could be saved by charities procuring from off-shore service providers for all such requirements.
If that was found to be viable, and HMRC attacked proportional VAT recovery on such costs, they may have achieved a partially Pyrrhic victory, since the use of offshore offices of such providers would not always prove impracticable. That said, anything that encourages cross-border shopping to mitigate tax can only be regarded as unfortunate, and charities may need to weigh up the competing pressures relating to preserving charitable resources on the one hand, but not appearing to pay lower tax than they ought on the other.
This decision creates a pretty considerable mess that will take some time to unravel.
Graham Elliott is Technical Adviser to the Charity Tax Group
Comments
I’m gone to say too my little brother, that he should also pay a quick
visit this blog on regular basis to take updated from hottest news
update. https://Lvivforum.pp.ua/
alo789 dang nh?p: alo 789 – 789alo
mexican pharmacy online: mexican pharmacy online order – mexican pharmacy online order
canadian pharmacy online: fda approved canadian online pharmacies – canadian pharmacy 24h com safe
https://mexicanpharminter.shop/# buying from online mexican pharmacy
canadian pharmacy sarasota
canadian pharmacy 365 highest rated canadian online pharmacy canadian drug pharmacy
https://interpharmonline.shop/# cheapest pharmacy canada
canadian pharmacy ltd
mexican drug stores online: mexican drug stores online – MexicanPharmInter
legit canadian pharmacy: InterPharmOnline – canadapharmacyonline com
http://interpharmonline.com/# cheap canadian pharmacy online
https://interpharmonline.shop/# precription drugs from canada
canadian pharmacy victoza
legit canadian pharmacy online: Cheapest online pharmacy – safe canadian pharmacy
india online pharmacy store: IndiaMedFast – cheapest online pharmacy india
http://indiamedfast.com/# lowest prescription prices online india
https://interpharmonline.com/# canadian neighbor pharmacy
canadian pharmacy 24h com safe
cheapest online pharmacy india: order medicines online india – india pharmacy without prescription
canadian pharmacy store: Cheapest online pharmacy – legit canadian pharmacy
https://indiamedfast.shop/# lowest prescription prices online india
https://indiamedfast.com/# India Med Fast
canadian pharmacy no rx needed
canadian drugstore online fda approved canadian online pharmacies canada rx pharmacy
MexicanPharmInter: mexican pharmacy online store – Mexican Pharm International
http://mexicanpharminter.com/# reliable mexican pharmacies
my canadian pharmacy
reputable canadian pharmacy: canada pharmacy no prescription – best canadian pharmacy online
canadian pharmacy online reviews: InterPharmOnline.com – cheapest pharmacy canada
https://indiamedfast.shop/# online medicine shopping in india
online medicine shopping in india buying prescription drugs from india order medicines online india
https://indiamedfast.com/# india pharmacy without prescription
canada ed drugs
precription drugs from canada: canada pharmacy no prescription – canadian pharmacy meds
canadian pharmacy 24 com: Online pharmacy USA – canadian pharmacy
https://indiamedfast.com/# lowest prescription prices online india
buy generic 100mg viagra online: Generic 100mg Easy – buy generic 100mg viagra online
cialis without a doctor prescription cialis without a doctor prescription cialis without a doctor prescription
https://tadalafileasybuy.com/# Cialis 20mg price in USA
https://generic100mgeasy.shop/# buy generic 100mg viagra online
Tadalafil Easy Buy: cialis without a doctor prescription – TadalafilEasyBuy.com
TadalafilEasyBuy.com: cialis without a doctor prescription – Cialis 20mg price
https://tadalafileasybuy.shop/# TadalafilEasyBuy.com
http://tadalafileasybuy.com/# Tadalafil Easy Buy
cialis without a doctor prescription: TadalafilEasyBuy.com – cialis without a doctor prescription
kamagra pillen kopen: kamagra 100mg kopen – Kamagra
Kamagra Kopen Online kamagra 100mg kopen Officiele Kamagra van Nederland
https://generic100mgeasy.com/# viagra without prescription
https://generic100mgeasy.com/# buy generic 100mg viagra online
Tadalafil Easy Buy: Tadalafil Easy Buy – Buy Tadalafil 5mg
Buy Tadalafil 10mg: cialis without a doctor prescription – TadalafilEasyBuy.com
http://tadalafileasybuy.com/# cialis without a doctor prescription
http://tadalafileasybuy.com/# Tadalafil Easy Buy
buy generic 100mg viagra online buy generic 100mg viagra online Generic100mgEasy
Buy Tadalafil 10mg: Cialis 20mg price – cialis without a doctor prescription
TadalafilEasyBuy.com: Tadalafil Tablet – Tadalafil Easy Buy
https://kamagrakopen.pro/# Kamagra Kopen
https://generic100mgeasy.shop/# Generic100mgEasy
Kamagra Kopen: Kamagra – Kamagra
Officiele Kamagra van Nederland: kamagra pillen kopen – KamagraKopen.pro
Generic100mgEasy buy generic 100mg viagra online Generic 100mg Easy
http://generic100mgeasy.com/# best price for viagra 100mg
https://kamagrakopen.pro/# kamagra jelly kopen
Generic100mgEasy: buy generic 100mg viagra online – Generic 100mg Easy
Generic100mgEasy: buy generic 100mg viagra online – Generic100mgEasy
Kamagra: KamagraKopen.pro – kamagra jelly kopen
https://kamagrakopen.pro/# kamagra pillen kopen
http://tadalafileasybuy.com/# Cheap Cialis
Tadalafil price cialis without a doctor prescription Cialis 20mg price
kamagra gel kopen: KamagraKopen.pro – KamagraKopen.pro
Officiele Kamagra van Nederland: kamagra jelly kopen – Kamagra
https://tadalafileasybuy.com/# cialis without a doctor prescription
http://tadalafileasybuy.com/# Tadalafil Easy Buy
Officiele Kamagra van Nederland: Kamagra Kopen – kamagra 100mg kopen
Cialis over the counter: TadalafilEasyBuy.com – Generic Cialis without a doctor prescription
https://tadalafileasybuy.shop/# cialis without a doctor prescription
https://kamagrakopen.pro/# Officiele Kamagra van Nederland
cheap viagra buy generic 100mg viagra online Generic100mgEasy
https://kamagrakopen.pro/# kamagra jelly kopen
cialis without a doctor prescription: cialis without a doctor prescription – Tadalafil Easy Buy
http://tadalafileasybuy.com/# cialis without a doctor prescription
Viagra generic over the counter: Generic100mgEasy – buy Viagra online
https://kamagrakopen.pro/# kamagra 100mg kopen
https://kamagrakopen.pro/# Kamagra
Generic Cialis without a doctor prescription: п»їcialis generic – Cialis 20mg price
Generic 100mg Easy Generic100mgEasy buy generic 100mg viagra online
пин ап вход – пин ап вход
пин ап зеркало – пинап казино
пинап казино – пин ап зеркало
пин ап казино: https://pinupkz.life/